Sweller J, Chandler P (1991) Evidence for cognitive load theory. Clin Chem 39(7):1468–1478ĭawson NV, Arkes HR (1987) Systematic errors in medical decision making. Acad Med 74(7):791–794ĭawson NV (1993) Physician judgment in clinical settings: methodological influences and cognitive performance. Acad Med 86(3):307–313Įlstein AS (1999) Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning. Eur J Int Med 24(6):525–529Įly JW, Graber ML, Croskerry P (2011) Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Van den Berge K, Mamede S (2013) Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine. Marewski JN, Gigerenzer G (2012) Heuristic decision making in medicine. Mamede S, Van Gog T, Van Den Berge K, Van Saase JL, Schmidt HG (2014) Why do doctors make mistakes? A study of the role of salient distracting clinical features. Anesthesiology 120(1):204–217Ĭroskerry P (2002) Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Stiegler MP, Tung A (2014) Cognitive processes in anesthesiology decision making. Ann Intern Med 156(5):340–349īlumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H (2015) Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Gaissmaier W, Gigerenzer G (2012) Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious, Penguin Books, New York ![]() Keys DJ, Schwartz B (2007) “Leaky” rationality: how research on behavioral decision making challenges normative standards of rationality. Rieskamp J, Otto PE (2006) SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. Cognition 87(1):B11–B22īell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A (1988) Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. Goel V, Dolan RJ (2003) Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Shreve J, Van Den Bos J, Gray T, Halford M, Rustagi K, Ziemkiewicz E, 2010 The economic measurement of medical errors sponsored by society of actuaries’ health section. National academy press, Washington, DCĪndel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA (2012) The economics of health care quality and medical errors. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system, vol 6. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Future efforts should assess heuristics in real-time and controlled trials should be applied to assess the potential impact of mitigating factors in reducing the negative impact of heuristics and optimizing their efficiency for positive outcomes. It remains unknown if heuristics are primarily positive or negative for clinical decision-making. Mitigating strategies such as reflective practice and technology may reduce the likelihood of inappropriate use. ![]() ![]() Heuristics are influenced by the context and conditions in which they are performed. Factors such as personality and level of experience may influence a doctor’s use of heuristics. Heuristics are mostly positive but can also result in negative consequences if not utilized appropriately. The Representativeness, Overconfidence and Bandwagon effects are also prevalent in medical practice. The most common decisional shortcuts used in medicine are the Availability, Anchoring and Confirmatory heuristics. Papers with evidence from other healthcare professions were included if medical practitioners were in the study sample. All English language papers including bias and the medical profession were included. ![]() The quasi-systematic review was conducted according to modified PRISMA guidelines utilizing the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Cinahl. This paper explores heuristics and the valuable role they play in medical practice, as well as offering potential solutions to minimize the risk of incorrect decision-making. The influence of ‘shortcuts’ in clinical decision-making, known as heuristics, remains unknown. Clinical decision-making is a daily practice conducted by medical practitioners, yet the processes surrounding it are poorly understood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |